[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


From: Yann Hodique
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 20:20:09 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux)

>>>>> "Eric" == Eric Schulte <address@hidden> writes:

> Yann Hodique <address@hidden> writes:
>> Note that it's the reason why my initial proposal was based on inline
>> multipart alternative. Providing a MIME fallback that any MUA should
>> recognize (such as text/plain) should increase vastly the chances of
>> proper formatting. At least GMail behaves "correctly" when the
>> text/plain alternative is provided.

> Yes, and gmx displays text/plain alternatives as well (although it also
> includes the text as an attachment).  Unfortunately when the text/plain
> alternative is provided Gnus does *not* fontify the text/x-sh preferred
> alternative but instead renders the plain text -- which sort of defaults
> the purpose of the whole exercise.

Really ? that sounds like a gnus bug then. I mean, if the text/plain
alternative is positioned correctly (meaning *first*), and there's no
fancy customization of `mm-discouraged-alternatives', the text/x-sh one
should indeed be preferred.
At least it worked as expected with the application/emacs-lisp pieces.


Nature commits no errors; right and wrong are human categories.

  -- PARDOT KYNES, Arrakis Lectures

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]