[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: inline build_string performance

From: Paul Eggert
Subject: Re: inline build_string performance
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:37:34 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1

On 06/26/2012 10:33 AM, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
> This may be implemented without reverting previous stuff.

Sure, but if we we use build_literal for literals, and
build_string for non-literals, there's a performance
downside for having build_string be inline (namely,
it bloats the code), but no performance upside.

Perhaps I'm not quite following your idea, as
I thought the signature would be build_literal ("foo"),
whereas your build_literal also wants the string length.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]