[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: coccinelle patch suggestion

From: Samuel Bronson
Subject: Re: coccinelle patch suggestion
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 11:40:16 -0400

On Jun 28, 2012, at 2:05 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote:

+10. Of course, it would be a toy task for coccinelle.  But, IMHO,
EXFUN makes the things clearer rather than obfuscating them.

Agreed. An alternative is to autogenerate all the EXFUNs for all F<foo>
functions into src/global.h, to make it more Lispy.

But wouldn't that trigger full rebuilds? I think it would probably be better to put them in headers which are associated with, say, the relevant subsystem...

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]