[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside)
From: |
Pascal J. Bourguignon |
Subject: |
Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside) |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Aug 2012 11:45:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) |
Aurélien Aptel <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> When I type a regex I'm always annoyed by the amount of escaping I have to do.
> I've always wished Emacs Lisp had raw strings ie. a syntax to type
> litteral text without interpretation.
>
> I've made 2 patch for the reader (src/lread.c). There are proofs of
> concepts, they should work on correct input but don't expect much.
>
> raw-string-python.diff use a syntax similar to python:
Why go to python, when Common Lisp has a perfectly nice reader macro
system to do that kind of things?
--
__Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/
A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}.
- Raw strings (experimental patches inside), Aurélien Aptel, 2012/08/02
- Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside),
Pascal J. Bourguignon <=
- Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside), Aurélien Aptel, 2012/08/03
- Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside), Lars Brinkhoff, 2012/08/05
- Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside), Stefan Monnier, 2012/08/05
- Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside), Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2012/08/06
- Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside), Stefan Monnier, 2012/08/06
- Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside), Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2012/08/06
Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside), Stefan Monnier, 2012/08/03