[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C backtraces for Emacs
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: C backtraces for Emacs |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Aug 2012 08:57:28 +0300 |
> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 21:41:03 -0700
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden, Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>
>
> I've checked in that change (trunk bzr 109765 and 109766)
> and so the Windows builds probably need tweaking now
> along the lines previously discussed.
Done.
> One other thing I just now noticed -- the Windows substitute
> for unistd.h may need something like this:
>
> #define STDIN_FILENO 0
> #define STDOUT_FILENO 1
> #define STDERR_FILENO 2
>
> if Windows doesn't already have the equivalent.
They are defined on stdio.h, so no changes are needed.
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, (continued)
Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Stefan Monnier, 2012/08/21
- C backtraces for Emacs, Paul Eggert, 2012/08/22
- Re: C backtraces for Emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/08/22
- Re: C backtraces for Emacs, Paul Eggert, 2012/08/22
- Re: C backtraces for Emacs, Daniel Colascione, 2012/08/22
- Re: C backtraces for Emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/08/23
Re: C backtraces for Emacs, Paul Eggert, 2012/08/24
Re: C backtraces for Emacs, Paul Eggert, 2012/08/25
Re: C backtraces for Emacs,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Paul Eggert, 2012/08/22
Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Andreas Schwab, 2012/08/22
Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Stefan Monnier, 2012/08/22
Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Paul Eggert, 2012/08/24
Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Tom Tromey, 2012/08/24
Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Paul Eggert, 2012/08/24
Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/08/25
Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Tom Tromey, 2012/08/25
Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Paul Eggert, 2012/08/26
Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Stefan Monnier, 2012/08/24