Re: [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r109864: Fix minor problems found by static checking.

[Paul Eggert]

On 09/03/2012 01:44 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> GCC false alarms aside, are there any reasons to prefer separate
> declaration and initialization?

I suspect the warning is designed more to enforce the C99
rule that one cannot jump over a declaration of a local
identifier whose type is variably modified.  If Emacs ever
starts using those types we may want to look into this again.

Or we may try cutting back on those gotos -- they are kinda
confusing ....