[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Release tags
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Release tags |
Date: |
Tue, 04 Sep 2012 19:57:49 +0300 |
> From: Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 17:57:11 +0200
>
> >> Or maybe this will land upon the next merge from emacs-24.
> >
> > Tags are pulled in by a merge from another branch in bzr? Seems
> > like a confusing misfeature to me if true.
>
> A tag is associated to a revision (actually, it is a name you give to a
> revision.) A revision can enter the history of any branch (via merge),
> therefore its associated tag(s) will appear on the logs of those
> branches.
And citing from bzr docs (assuming you believe them ;-):
Tags give human-meaningful names to revisions. Commands that take a
-r (–revision) option can be given -rtag:X, where X is any
previously created tag.
Tags are stored in the branch. Tags are copied from one branch to
another along when you branch, push, pull or merge.
- Re: Release tags, (continued)
- Re: Release tags, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/09/04
- Re: Release tags, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/09/05
- Re: Release tags, Jambunathan K, 2012/09/05
- Re: Release tags, Tim Cross, 2012/09/05
- Re: Release tags, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/05
- Re: Release tags, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/05
- Re: Release tags, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/05
- Re: Release tags, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/09/05
- Re: Release tags, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/05
- Re: Release tags, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/05
- Re: Release tags,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Release tags, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/04
- Re: Release tags, Glenn Morris, 2012/09/05