[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: threads and kill-buffer
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: threads and kill-buffer |
|
Date: |
Wed, 05 Sep 2012 22:46:39 +0300 |
> From: Tom Tromey <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 12:20:38 -0600
>
> I suppose we may also want a new predicate to detect this state.
At least internally, yes. Not sure we should expose that to Lisp.
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, (continued)
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/09/05
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Tom Tromey, 2012/09/05
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/05
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/09/05
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/09/05
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/05
- Re: threads and kill-buffer,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/05
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/06
Re: threads and kill-buffer, SAKURAI Masashi, 2012/09/04
Re: threads and kill-buffer, Dmitry Antipov, 2012/09/05