[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: threads and kill-buffer
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: threads and kill-buffer |
Date: |
Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:55:35 +0300 |
> Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 16:41:39 +0200
> From: martin rudalics <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> Suppose *Backtrace* is current in thread A and gets killed by thread B.
Why does it get killed?
> Before making another buffer current for A, a debugger buffer must be
> revived for B.
Why is there a need to make "another buffer current for A"?. And why
"a debugger buffer must be revived for B"? The "must" part is
particularly confusing.
> Would that be a different buffer from the *Backtrace* seen in A?
Yes.
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, (continued)
Re: threads and kill-buffer, SAKURAI Masashi, 2012/09/04
Re: threads and kill-buffer, Dmitry Antipov, 2012/09/05
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, martin rudalics, 2012/09/05
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/05
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, martin rudalics, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, martin rudalics, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, martin rudalics, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, martin rudalics, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, martin rudalics, 2012/09/07
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, martin rudalics, 2012/09/07
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/07
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, martin rudalics, 2012/09/07