[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: threads and kill-buffer
|
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
|
Subject: |
Re: threads and kill-buffer |
|
Date: |
Thu, 06 Sep 2012 13:07:50 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>> Would that be a different buffer from the *Backtrace* seen in A?
>> Yes.
> After trying to understand the internals of `debug' in the past days,
> I'd be curious how this could be done.
Why? When you killed the first *Backtrace* buffer, it lost its name, so
when B pops a new backtrace, it creates a new *Backtrace* buffer.
Stefan
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, (continued)
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, SAKURAI Masashi, 2012/09/04
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Dmitry Antipov, 2012/09/05
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, martin rudalics, 2012/09/05
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/05
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, martin rudalics, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, martin rudalics, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, martin rudalics, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, martin rudalics, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, martin rudalics, 2012/09/07
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, martin rudalics, 2012/09/07
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/07
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, martin rudalics, 2012/09/07
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/07
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, PJ Weisberg, 2012/09/06