Re: threads and kill-buffer

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 19:37:10 +0200
> From: martin rudalics <address@hidden>
> CC: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>, address@hidden, address@hidden, 
>  address@hidden
> 
>  > Why?  When you killed the first *Backtrace* buffer, it lost its name, so
>  > when B pops a new backtrace, it creates a new *Backtrace* buffer.
> 
> And if, at the time it gets killed, *Backtrace* appears in a window
> managed by thread A what do I see after it has been killed?

*Backtrace*, of course.

And if you are going to ask next about buffer B's backtrace buffer, I
guess we will have to arrange for it to be called *Backtrace*<2> in
this case.