Re: threads and kill-buffer

[martin rudalics]

> And if you are going to ask next about buffer B's backtrace buffer, I
> guess we will have to arrange for it to be called *Backtrace*<2> in
> this case.

And that would break the old `debug' code and any code that relies on
hard-coded buffer names.  String constants like *Backtrace* or *Help*
are part of the global Emacs state.  Changing that might be profitable
but is certainly more tedious than implementing threads in the first
place.

martin