[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: threads and kill-buffer
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: threads and kill-buffer |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Sep 2012 18:21:03 +0300 |
> From: Nix <address@hidden>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>, address@hidden, address@hidden,
> address@hidden, address@hidden
> Emacs: the road to Hell is paved with extensibility.
> Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 15:58:16 +0100
>
> On 7 Sep 2012, PJ Weisberg spake thusly:
> > No, I was just brainstorming things that used to be safe assumptions
> > (`get-buffer-create' returns a displayable buffer) and now might not
> > be.
>
> It's not safe now. A process sentinel could come along and destroy it
> before you have finished running.
But a process sentinel can run only when Emacs is idle, right?
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, (continued)
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, martin rudalics, 2012/09/07
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, martin rudalics, 2012/09/07
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/07
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, martin rudalics, 2012/09/07
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/07
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, PJ Weisberg, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/07
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, PJ Weisberg, 2012/09/07
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Nix, 2012/09/08
- Re: threads and kill-buffer,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/08
Re: threads and kill-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/05