[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reachable killed buffers
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: Reachable killed buffers |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Sep 2012 10:11:59 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120828 Thunderbird/15.0 |
On 09/13/2012 09:49 AM, martin rudalics wrote:
> If a buffer on one of these lists is dead, it simply doesn't get
> marked from the list, so it's possible that it's reclaimed with the
> next sweep.
Right, but as I understand it in the meantime it would still exist as
a dead buffer, and would continue to pressure the GC. And it might
inadvertently survive the next sweep too, no? The goal is to reclaim
all the dead buffers, not just some of them.
- Re: Reachable killed buffers, (continued)
- Re: Reachable killed buffers, martin rudalics, 2012/09/12
- Re: Reachable killed buffers, Dmitry Antipov, 2012/09/12
- Re: Reachable killed buffers, martin rudalics, 2012/09/12
- Re: Reachable killed buffers, Paul Eggert, 2012/09/12
- Re: Reachable killed buffers, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/12
- Re: Reachable killed buffers, Paul Eggert, 2012/09/13
- Re: Reachable killed buffers, Dmitry Antipov, 2012/09/13
- Re: Reachable killed buffers, Paul Eggert, 2012/09/13
- Re: Reachable killed buffers, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/13
- Re: Reachable killed buffers, martin rudalics, 2012/09/13
- Re: Reachable killed buffers,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: Reachable killed buffers, martin rudalics, 2012/09/13
- Re: Reachable killed buffers, Dmitry Antipov, 2012/09/14
- Re: Reachable killed buffers, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/14
- Re: Reachable killed buffers, martin rudalics, 2012/09/14
- Re: Reachable killed buffers, Dmitry Antipov, 2012/09/13
Re: [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r109890: Do not mark objects from deleted buffers, windows and frames., martin rudalics, 2012/09/06