[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: vc-print-log vs. bzr log
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: vc-print-log vs. bzr log |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Sep 2012 22:36:13 +0300 |
> From: Stephen Berman <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 19:36:01 +0200
>
> > What do you see in ~/.bzr.log if you invoke
> >
> > bzr log -l1 gnus-group.el
> >
> > from the shell prompt?
>
> Sat 2012-09-15 19:26:14 +0200
> 0.127 bazaar version: 2.5.1
> 0.127 bzr arguments: [u'log', u'-l1', u'gnus-group.el']
> 0.131 looking for plugins in /home/steve/.bazaar/plugins
> 0.139 looking for plugins in
> /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/bzrlib/plugins
> 0.163 looking for plugins in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/bzrlib/plugins
> 0.171 encoding stdout as sys.stdout encoding 'UTF-8'
> 0.228 opening working tree '/data/steve/bzr/emacs/quickfixes'
> 0.312 encoding stdout as sys.stdout encoding 'UTF-8'
> 18.968 Transferred: 0kB (0.0kB/s r:0kB w:0kB)
> 18.968 return code 0
So it's bzr itself, not VC. I guess a bug report to the bzr bug
tracker is in order, after all.
- vc-print-log vs. bzr log, Stephen Berman, 2012/09/15
- Re: vc-print-log vs. bzr log, Andreas Schwab, 2012/09/15
- Re: vc-print-log vs. bzr log, Stephen Berman, 2012/09/15
- Re: vc-print-log vs. bzr log, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/15
- Re: vc-print-log vs. bzr log, Stephen Berman, 2012/09/15
- Re: vc-print-log vs. bzr log, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/15
- Re: vc-print-log vs. bzr log, Stephen Berman, 2012/09/15
- Re: vc-print-log vs. bzr log, Andreas Schwab, 2012/09/15
- Re: vc-print-log vs. bzr log,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: vc-print-log vs. bzr log, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/15