|
From: | Stefan Monnier |
Subject: | Re: Should lexical-let use let in the situation lexical-binding is t ? |
Date: | Wed, 19 Sep 2012 23:26:41 -0400 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) |
> yep, that's why Common Lisp recommends defvar'd variables to be named > with "*" around the names. Yup, and in Elisp we use the "<prefix>-" convention instead (which was originally introduced to make up for the lack of packages). Stefan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |