Re: Should lexical-let use let in the situation lexical-binding is t ?

[Sam Steingold]

> * Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> [2012-09-19 23:26:41 -0400]:
>
>> yep, that's why Common Lisp recommends defvar'd variables to be named
>> with "*" around the names.
>
> Yup, and in Elisp we use the "<prefix>-" convention instead (which
> was originally introduced to make up for the lack of packages).

yep, and `tab-width' is a perfect example of why this is not a good
convention.

-- 
Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on Ubuntu 12.04 (precise) X 11.0.11103000
http://www.childpsy.net/ http://pmw.org.il http://americancensorship.org
http://www.PetitionOnline.com/tap12009/ http://honestreporting.com
There are many reasons not to use Lisp - but no good ones.