Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature"

[Steinar Bang]

>>>>> Richard Stallman <address@hidden>:

>> Core dumps are better than backtraces if they're available, but
>> modern GNUish distributions often disable them, alas, and they're a
>> pain to send via email, and it's nice to have a bit more info than
>> 'Fatal error 27' when Emacs crashes.

> If you get a core dump, you can run GDB and make a backtrace
> and mail that.

Can you get a backtrace even if the core is from an executable that was
compiled without debug information?