[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*'
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*' |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Sep 2012 07:11:22 -0700 |
> > 1. That's certainly what I am doing for now, at least. But
> > deprecation typically expresses an intention to later desupport.
> > My question is really what is recommended for supporting multiple
> > Emacs releases when `loop' etc. are no longer supported.
>
> If that ever happens in your lifetime,
Well, long life to you too, Eli!
> you can always add to your packages a compatibility layer
> that simply introduces back the aliases we have now.
Ugh.
- RE: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', (continued)
- RE: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', Drew Adams, 2012/09/25
- Re: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/25
- RE: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', Drew Adams, 2012/09/25
- Re: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/25
- Re: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', Bastien, 2012/09/26
- Re: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/26
- Re: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', Bastien, 2012/09/26
- RE: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', Drew Adams, 2012/09/26
- Re: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/26
- Re: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/26
- RE: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*',
Drew Adams <=
- Re: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', Jason Rumney, 2012/09/26
Re: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', Helmut Eller, 2012/09/25