[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Elisp native profiler
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Elisp native profiler |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Sep 2012 21:31:55 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:49:57 -0400
>
> >> I didn't say we should prevent users of other platforms from enjoying
> >> this feature. But if this will be in 24.3, someone, probably myself,
> >> will need to add the missing pieces to get it working on Windows.
>
> > Btw, is it possible to have a simple test case, starting from "emacs -Q",
> > to check that the profiling (both cpu and memory) works? That would
> > simplify testing of this on MS-Windows.
>
> I typically do:
>
> emacs -Q
> M-x profiler-start RET
> C-x C-f src/regexp.c RET
> page-down until I get to the end of the buffer, then page-up to the
> beginning
> M-x profiler-report RET
(I presume that was regex.c, not regexp.c.)
Thanks for the recipe.
> Verifying that the resulting profile is accurate is rather difficult,
> of course, so as long as it looks credible, I assume it's more or
> less correct.
Can you show your results, for the reference?
The first lines in what I got (still only the memory profiler, the
itimer code is in the works and not ready yet) look suspicious to me
in the last column:
+ call-interactively 46,352,691 2%
+ Automatic Redisplay 30,389,586 -1%
+ scroll-up-command 24,834,342 2%
+ jit-lock-function 20,082,147 0%
+ scroll-up 15,687,351 3%
+ jit-lock-fontify-now 2,196,032 1%
+ byte-code 1,426,989 1%
+ read-from-minibuffer 312,804 0%
+ run-hook-with-args 237,005 0%
(Overflow?)
Here's the same with the + signs expanded:
- call-interactively 46,352,691 2%
- scroll-up-command 43,373,729 0%
- scroll-up 43,373,729 0%
- jit-lock-function 41,648,995 0%
- jit-lock-fontify-now 41,648,995 0%
- byte-code 41,619,059 0%
- run-hook-with-args 41,619,059 0%
- font-lock-fontify-region 41,619,059 0%
- c-font-lock-fontify-region 41,619,059 0%
- font-lock-default-fontify-region 40,842,125 -1%
- font-lock-fontify-keywords-region 39,963,822 -2%
- c-font-lock-declarations 34,602,780 1%
- c-find-decl-spots 34,602,780 1%
+ #<compiled 0x40567bf> 28,867,024 -2%
looking-at 2,817,588 1%
re-search-forward 1,791,738 1%
- c-forward-sws 413,348 0%
looking-at 355,304 0%
put-text-property 26,844 0%
- c-beginning-of-current-toke 150,676 0%
looking-at 150,676 0%
- c-beginning-of-macro 66,408 0%
looking-at 66,408 0%
- c-backward-sws 39,468 0%
c-beginning-of-macro 12,480 0%
- Re: Elisp native profiler, (continued)
- Re: Elisp native profiler, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/09/25
- Re: Elisp native profiler, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/25
- Re: Elisp native profiler, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/26
- Re: Elisp native profiler, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/26
- Re: Elisp native profiler, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/26
- Re: Elisp native profiler, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/26
- Re: Elisp native profiler, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/26
- Re: Elisp native profiler,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Elisp native profiler, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/26
- Re: Elisp native profiler, Tomohiro Matsuyama, 2012/09/26
- Re: Elisp native profiler, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/27
- Re: Elisp native profiler, Paul Eggert, 2012/09/30
- Re: Elisp native profiler, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/29
- Re: Elisp native profiler, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/29
- Re: Elisp native profiler, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/29
- Re: Elisp native profiler, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/29
- Re: Elisp native profiler, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/30
Re: Elisp native profiler, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/09/25