[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Elisp native profiler

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: Elisp native profiler
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 19:49:53 +0200

> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden,  address@hidden,  address@hidden
> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 08:37:48 -0400
> > IMO: the "cpu" part is not correct.  How about profiler-funcall-* or
> > profiler-execution-* instead?
> Why?  The distinction between profiler-cpu-* and profiler-memory-* is
> the "time basis", where one uses "cpu time" and the other "memory
> allocation", hence the names.  "funcall" and "execution" both seem
> completely unrelated.

Well, I'm at a disadvantage here, since I didn't yet see the result of
this.  I assumed that it is similar to what gprof produces, whose
product is known as "execution profile" or "call graph profile".
That's why I suggested "execution" or "funcall".

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]