[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature"
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature" |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Sep 2012 22:01:12 +0200 |
> From: Juri Linkov <address@hidden>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 22:31:27 +0300
>
> Would be better to increase the number of lines to 24 or 32
> or any other round number.
Instead of guessing, I'd suggest a small research: collect all the
backtraces reported to the bug tracker, and build the historgram of
their sizes. Then decide based on that.
I would also suggest some heuristics, e.g. if the crash is in GC, the
number will have to be much larger.
- Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", (continued)
- Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/22
- Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Paul Eggert, 2012/09/22
- Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/09/23
- Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Andreas Schwab, 2012/09/23
- Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/09/23
- Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Nix, 2012/09/23
- Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/09/24
- Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Nix, 2012/09/24
- Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/09/24
Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Juri Linkov, 2012/09/29
Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/29
Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/30
Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Paul Eggert, 2012/09/30
Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Chong Yidong, 2012/09/30
Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Richard Stallman, 2012/09/21