[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature"
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature" |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Sep 2012 13:51:08 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120912 Thunderbird/15.0.1 |
On 09/29/2012 01:01 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> I'd suggest a small research
It'd be nice to do that, but until someone has the time,
how about if we just bump the handle_fatal_signal
backtrace number from 10 to 24? It sounds like that would
have addressed Juri's problem.
- Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", (continued)
- Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Paul Eggert, 2012/09/22
- Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/09/23
- Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Andreas Schwab, 2012/09/23
- Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/09/23
- Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Nix, 2012/09/23
- Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/09/24
- Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Nix, 2012/09/24
- Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/09/24
Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Juri Linkov, 2012/09/29
Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/29
Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/30
Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Paul Eggert, 2012/09/30
Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Chong Yidong, 2012/09/30
Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Richard Stallman, 2012/09/21