Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature"

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Cc: Juri Linkov <address@hidden>,  address@hidden,  address@hidden
> Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 21:48:39 -0400
> 
> I still would prefer going back to having the easserts in macros rather
> than in functions (so that the assertion itself immediately gives you
> the line-number, without having to go through the addr2line rigmarole).

Sorry, I don't follow: the eassert macro includes the file name and
the line number in the message it prints, together with the condition
that was violated.