[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature"
From: |
Chong Yidong |
Subject: |
Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature" |
Date: |
Mon, 01 Oct 2012 10:54:41 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> I really dislike the idea of writing those backtraces into a file (when
> RMS mentioned it, I was shocked), but the more it goes, the more I think
> it would make sense for the non-ENABLE_CHECKING builds. Tho maybe just
> not showing the backtraces at all would work just as well in those cases.
The user often wouldn't even be aware of the existence of these files.
Littering the filesystem with these backtrace files is kind of
obnoxious.
- Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", (continued)
- Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Juri Linkov, 2012/09/29
- Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/29
- Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Paul Eggert, 2012/09/29
- Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/29
- Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Paul Eggert, 2012/09/29
- messages-buffer-max-lines (was: The emacs_backtrace "feature"), Juri Linkov, 2012/09/30
- Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/29
- Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/30
- Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Paul Eggert, 2012/09/30
- Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature",
Chong Yidong <=
Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature", Richard Stallman, 2012/09/21