[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: Dual licensing of Org manual? |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Dec 2012 16:35:32 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> Please don't change anything about the Org manual licensing.
Please see my other message in this thread.
The notice in version 7.9.2 of the Org manual* says:
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or
any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no
Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts being “A GNU Manual,”
and with the Back-Cover Texts as in (a) below. A copy of the license
is included in the section entitled “GNU Free Documentation License.”
(a) The FSF’s Back-Cover Text is: “You have the freedom to copy and
modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF supports it in
developing GNU and promoting software freedom.”
This document is part of a collection distributed under the GNU Free
Documentation License. If you want to distribute this document
separately from the collection, you can do so by adding a copy of the
license to the document, as described in section 6 of the license.
Note that
(1) it's already mentioned "no Invariant Sections";
(2) the note about the Back-Cover Texts as in (a) is irrelevant because
the FSF does not sell the Org manual;
(3)
http://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/License-Notices-for-Documentation.html
says:
If your manual is not published by the FSF, and under 400 pages,
you can omit both cover texts.
I thought it applied to the Org manual so allowed myself to remove
the Cover Texts and the last paragraph of the notice.
Let me know what should be fixed.
Thanks,
* See
http://orgmode.org/cgit.cgi/org-mode.git/plain/doc/org.texi?h=maint&id=df0991
--
Bastien
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, (continued)
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/15
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/16
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bill Wohler, 2012/12/19
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/19
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/20
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bill Wohler, 2012/12/20
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/20
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/21
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/20
Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/14
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?,
Bastien <=