[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: is requiring cl bad?
From: |
Xue Fuqiao |
Subject: |
Re: is requiring cl bad? |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Dec 2012 18:14:44 +0800 |
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 10:29:30 +0100
Ivan Kanis <address@hidden> wrote:
> I was under the impression that requiring cl was bad (TM). I can't
> remember why. Is it still so?
You can see these pages:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2003-08/msg00436.html
http://www.gnu.org/gnu/rms-lisp.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-09/msg01472.html
BTW, what does "TM" mean(English is not my native language)?
--
Best regards, Xue Fuqiao.
http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/XueFuqiao
- is requiring cl bad?, Ivan Kanis, 2012/12/16
- Re: is requiring cl bad?,
Xue Fuqiao <=
- Re: is requiring cl bad?, Stefan Monnier, 2012/12/16
- Re: is requiring cl bad?, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2012/12/17
- Re: is requiring cl bad?, Tony Day, 2012/12/17
- Re: is requiring cl bad?, David De La Harpe Golden, 2012/12/19
- Re: is requiring cl bad?, Ivan Kanis, 2012/12/20
- Re: is requiring cl bad?, Helmut Eller, 2012/12/20
- Re: is requiring cl bad?, David De La Harpe Golden, 2012/12/21