[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Loading souce Elisp faster
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
Re: Loading souce Elisp faster |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Feb 2013 20:20:15 +0100 |
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Stefan Monnier
<address@hidden> wrote:
>> The .el8 (and .emacs8) way seems both fast and excluding backward
>> compatibility trouble.
>
> We need to worry about both backward and forward compatibility, so this
> choice is rather undesirable.
When is compatibility a problem with this choice? (You can of course
put a "coding" comment too in the files.)
- Re: Loading souce Elisp faster, (continued)
- Re: Loading souce Elisp faster, Achim Gratz, 2013/02/25
- Re: Loading souce Elisp faster, Richard Stallman, 2013/02/25
- Re: Loading souce Elisp faster, Stefan Monnier, 2013/02/25
- RE: Loading souce Elisp faster, Drew Adams, 2013/02/25
- Re: Loading souce Elisp faster, Stefan Monnier, 2013/02/25
- Re: Loading souce Elisp faster, Lennart Borgman, 2013/02/25
- Re: Loading souce Elisp faster, Stefan Monnier, 2013/02/25
- Re: Loading souce Elisp faster,
Lennart Borgman <=
- Re: Loading souce Elisp faster, Stefan Monnier, 2013/02/25
- Re: Loading souce Elisp faster, Lennart Borgman, 2013/02/25
- Re: Loading souce Elisp faster, Stefan Monnier, 2013/02/25
- Re: Loading souce Elisp faster, Lennart Borgman, 2013/02/25
- Re: Loading souce Elisp faster, Lennart Borgman, 2013/02/25
- Re: Loading souce Elisp faster, Achim Gratz, 2013/02/26
- Re: Loading souce Elisp faster, Lennart Borgman, 2013/02/26
- Re: Loading souce Elisp faster, Dmitry Gutov, 2013/02/26
- Re: Loading souce Elisp faster, Lennart Borgman, 2013/02/26
- Re: Loading souce Elisp faster, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/02/25