[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Emacs-devel Digest, Vol 109, Issue 57

From: d.henman
Subject: Re: Emacs-devel Digest, Vol 109, Issue 57
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 00:20:33 +1000

Mr. Stallman's statement was factual and accurately described the messages' 
function. It was by no means an attack on ones character, or lack thereof.  
That has already been made known, by yourself.   I must admit that your 
messages, being melodramatic a
nd the use of silly phraseology is kind of funny, but, alas, it doesn't belong 
on this list.  I invite you to withdraw your pleasure in this developement 


address@hidden wrote:
> From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden>
> You dismissed the content of what I wrote, citing not the content, but
> an attribution of intent to me.  That is, without doubt, argumentum ad
> hominem.
> Your attribution was also false.  I am genuinely concerned that the
> FSF and I disagree over the scope of my assignments.  I don't know if
> it matters enough to me to do something about it -- I'll have to think
> about that -- but I was shocked by the breadth of the claim that you
> seemed to be making.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]