Re: x-display-pixel-width/height inconsistency

[Dmitry Gutov]

YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <address@hidden> writes:

>>>>>> On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 03:15:06 +0400, Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden> said:
>
>>>> But the actual return value is different among the platforms:
>>> 
>>>> * W32 port: Dimension of the primary monitor. (Not actually
>>>> tested, but guessed from the code and API documentations.)
>>> 
>>> Could someone using multi-monitor setups on W32 check if this guess
>>> is correct?  I'm confused because an API reference in English (*1)
>>> says
>
>> It is correct.
>
> Thanks for checking.  Does the following patch give dimensions of all
> physical monitors as in X11?  Do display-mm-height/width return
> meaningful values?

Sorry, can't apply the patch, `bzr patch' says 

bzr: ERROR: Error invoking patch: Invalid argument

If you resend it in unified format, I can try to apply it manually.

Without the patch, display-mm-height/width return some values, same on
both monitors, but I can't tell how they relate to x-display-*
functions.

ELISP> (x-display-pixel-height)
1200
ELISP> (x-display-pixel-width)
1920
ELISP> (display-mm-height)
423
ELISP> (display-mm-width)
677