[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 08:28:36 +0200

> From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 10:42:38 +0900
> Cc: Per Starb├Ąck <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> Stefan Monnier writes:
>  > BTW, in this same area, it would be good to detect and indicate
>  > prominently "Unix with some CRLFs", also known as "mixed-line-ending",
>  > which is often misunderstood as "my Emacs fails to recognize my CRLF
>  > file".
> Unicode doesn't care, you know: it considers all ASCII line breaks and
> terminators to be the same thing (NEW LINE FUNCTION).  I haven't read
> that part of the standard in a long time, but IIRC, although many
> people interpolate "according to platform", Unicode doesn't care about
> that, it just says "all of these sequences when encountered in text
> purporting to conform to this standard should be treated in the same
> way."  Emacsen should do the same.

That would require Emacs to store all the possible EOL sequences in
the buffer, and treat them all identically.  That's doable, but is a
non-trivial job; volunteers are welcome.

> The question then is how to deal with file comparison.  We'd like to
> avoid creating spurious diffs based on "fixing" random different line
> endings

If Emacs is to support different EOL formats in the same file, it
should not convert them at all.  Anything else _will_ introduce
spurious modifications, and could even corrupt some files, if the
exact EOL sequence here or there matters.

> I guess one could attach a text property to newlines differing from
> the file's autodetected EOL convention.

Not sure how a text property should help here.

> I've also considered switching the internal representation of newline

What good would that be?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]