Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac

[Stephen J. Turnbull]

Eli Zaretskii writes:

 > If we want to continue with a clear indication of mixed style, then
 > perhaps no changes are needed at all, as we do that now.  The only
 > change in that case might be a mode-line indication of the mixed
 > style, since the offending CR characters might not be visible in the
 > displayed portion of the file.
 > 
 > I rather thought the suggestion was to stop paying attention to what
 > exactly is used as EOL, including if they are mixed-style.

That's what I have in mind.