[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development
From: |
Carsten Dominik |
Subject: |
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Mar 2013 08:53:14 +0100 |
On 26 mrt. 2013, at 20:38, John Wiegley <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> We have often debated the merits of Git vs. Bazaar, and which one the GNU
> project should use for Emacs development. I think now is an appropriate time
> to revisit this decision.
>
> My main reason for bringing this up again is that Bazaar development has
> effectively stalled. There are major bugs which have been in their
> bug-tracker for years now -- bugs affecting Emacs development, such as the
> ELPA repository -- whach have been ignored all this time. There are also
> other factors, but this one alone is significant enough that I think it
> justifies us switching over to Git all by itself.
>
> So, to Richard as the undisputed Czar of all things Emacs: can we now, pretty
> please, switch to Git? :) I'm happy to coordinate whatever resources it takes
> to make a full and faithful conversion from Bzr happen as soon as possible.
For what it is worth, I believe that the Org-mode community
would wholeheartedly support such a move, it would simplify things
for us enormously.
With kind regards
- Carsten Dominik
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, (continued)
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Allen S. Rout, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Josh, 2013/03/27
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stefan Monnier, 2013/03/27
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Michael Welsh Duggan, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Leo Liu, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, John Wiegley, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2013/03/27
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development,
Carsten Dominik <=
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Julien Danjou, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, David Engster, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Julien Danjou, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stefan Monnier, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, David Engster, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stephen Leake, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stephen Leake, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/03/27