[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Mar 2013 05:56:36 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:09:34 +0100 Julien Danjou <address@hidden> wrote:
JD> On Tue, Mar 26 2013, John Wiegley wrote:
>> We have often debated the merits of Git vs. Bazaar, and which one the GNU
>> project should use for Emacs development. I think now is an appropriate time
>> to revisit this decision.
JD> I strongly support this initiative.
I support it, likewise. We've had technical developments since Bazaar
was chosen:
- magit.el has matured; VCS mode has improved Git support
- Git credential helpers let the user get and store authentication
tokens to external facilities like the Mac OS X or W32 keychain (I
wrote one to talk to a netrc file with or without GPG encryption,
allowing Git and Emacs' auth-source.el to share the same netrc file)
- I am not aware of any projects choosing Bazaar for any reason,
technical or not, since RMS' decision.
- the Gnus project has a person dedicated to Bazaar-Git bidirectional
synchronization; it is a very demanding task for the rest of us.
Ted
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, (continued)
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Michael Welsh Duggan, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Leo Liu, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, John Wiegley, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Carsten Dominik, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Julien Danjou, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development,
Ted Zlatanov <=
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, David Engster, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Julien Danjou, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stefan Monnier, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, David Engster, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stephen Leake, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stephen Leake, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stephen Leake, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Andreas Schwab, 2013/03/28