[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: superword-mode
From: |
Davis Herring |
Subject: |
Re: superword-mode |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:16:26 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110717 Lanikai/3.1.11 |
> TZ> 1) use `forward-sexp' instead of `forward-symbol'
> TZ> 2) implement a local version of `forward-symbol'
> TZ> 3) autoload `forward-symbol'
>
> In order to avoid breakage I implemented (1) but please tell me if you
> think that's the wrong decision. Thanks.
I think it's certainly wrong to do (1) -- a balanced set of parentheses
or so is not a natural extension of a word the way a symbol is, and it
seems useful for M-f and C-M-f to remain distinct under
`superword-mode'. I don't have a preference between (2) and (3), except
to say that either the (2) version or the thingatpt version could be
(re)written to use \_< and \_> just like `cfengine-mode'.
Davis
--
This product is sold by volume, not by mass. If it appears too dense or
too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during
shipping.
- Re: superword-mode, (continued)
- Re: superword-mode, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/03/28
- Re: superword-mode, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/03/29
- Re: superword-mode, Andreas Röhler, 2013/03/29
- Re: superword-mode, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/03/29
- Re: superword-mode, Andreas Röhler, 2013/03/29
- Re: superword-mode, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/03/29
- Re: superword-mode, Andreas Röhler, 2013/03/29
- Re: superword-mode, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/03/29
- Re: superword-mode,
Davis Herring <=
- Re: superword-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2013/03/29
- Re: superword-mode, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/03/29
- Re: superword-mode, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/03/29
- Re: superword-mode, Andreas Röhler, 2013/03/30
- Re: [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r112104: * progmodes/cfengine.el (cfengine-common-syntax): Add "_" to word syntax., Stefan Monnier, 2013/03/22