|
From: | Jay Belanger |
Subject: | Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development |
Date: | Tue, 02 Apr 2013 10:19:05 -0500 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
> Not that onerous? The Canonical Individual Contributor License > Agreement requires you to explicitly authorise Canonical to license the > contributed software under a proprietary license. See section 2.3 of > the agreement. I don't know if onerous is the right word, but I find this incredibly surprising. There is a GNU project where, if you want to contribute, you have to explicitly say that your contributions can be put under a proprietary license. Why would this be a GNU project?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |