[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:19:08 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130311 Thunderbird/17.0.4 |
On 04/17/13 12:15, Glenn Morris wrote:
> I have never considered the
> speed of configure an issue. Why is MS Windows any different
It's not. 'configure' is too slow on GNU/Linux,
it's too slow on Solaris, and it'll be too slow
on MS-Windows.
On my two-year-old desktop (GNU/Linux, AMD Phenom II X4 910e)
'configure' takes 65 seconds, whereas 'rm */*.o; make -j4'
takes 45 seconds. 'configure' is a major bottleneck in building,
and where it's easy (as it is here) we should strive to have
'configure' run faster.
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, (continued)
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Glenn Morris, 2013/04/16
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Paul Eggert, 2013/04/16
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/17
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Glenn Morris, 2013/04/17
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Paul Eggert, 2013/04/17
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Glenn Morris, 2013/04/18
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/18
Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Glenn Morris, 2013/04/17
Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Glenn Morris, 2013/04/17
Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Dani Moncayo, 2013/04/18