[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GSoC 2013
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: GSoC 2013 |
Date: |
Mon, 06 May 2013 15:01:05 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> writes:
> Daimrod writes:
>
> > From what I've seen, Emacs [doesn't need to do any of the things
> > that are required of suborgs in some other umbrella orgs]. As
> > you've pointed out, Emacs doesn't have an ideas page, and only two
> > students have expressed themselves after I've told I wanted to
> > participate to the GSoC. Besides, Emacs doesn't need to be a formal
> > organization because it is under the GNU umbrella.
>
> I wonder what Carol and Cat would say. But I won't ask.
When you "refactor" what someone says, it would be fair to explicitely
say so, instead of just relying on the weak convention that [..] means
that *you* put what you want in the square brackets.
Also, I don't get the point of the whole thread: if you think Emacs
does not deserve to get one or more GSoC slots from the GNU project,
fine. I doubt Google (aka "Carol and Cat") wants to assess the way
Orgs organize themselves to allocate slots.
--
Bastien
- Re: GSoC 2013, (continued)
- Re: GSoC 2013, Xue Fuqiao, 2013/05/05
- Re: GSoC 2013, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/05/05
- Re: GSoC 2013, Daimrod, 2013/05/05
- Re: GSoC 2013, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/05/05
- Re: GSoC 2013, chad, 2013/05/05
- Re: GSoC 2013, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/05/06
- Re: GSoC 2013, joakim, 2013/05/06
- Re: GSoC 2013, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/05/06
- Re: GSoC 2013, Daimrod, 2013/05/06
- Re: GSoC 2013, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/05/06
- Re: GSoC 2013,
Bastien <=
- Re: GSoC 2013, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/05/06
- Re: GSoC 2013, Daimrod, 2013/05/05
Re: GSoC 2013, Daimrod, 2013/05/04