[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: windows build failure
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: windows build failure |
Date: |
Wed, 29 May 2013 14:27:28 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130311 Thunderbird/17.0.4 |
On 05/29/13 13:28, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> If we do this somewhere (e.g., in nt/config.nt):
>
> #define restrict __restrict
>
> would this solve the problem even when -std=gnu99 is not in use?
It might, yes. But it's probably better not to.
If 'configure' is using different CFLAGS than 'make' is using,
there are likely other screwups, some of which could well cause
subtle runtime failures. It could well be a good thing that
the messed-up build is failing so reliably.
- windows build failure, (continued)
- windows build failure, Sean Sieger, 2013/05/28
- Re: windows build failure, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/28
- Re: windows build failure, rzl24ozi, 2013/05/29
- Re: windows build failure, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/29
- Re: windows build failure, Óscar Fuentes, 2013/05/29
- Re: windows build failure, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/29
- Re: windows build failure, Paul Eggert, 2013/05/29
- Re: windows build failure, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/29
- Re: windows build failure, Paul Eggert, 2013/05/29
- Re: windows build failure, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/29
- Re: windows build failure,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: windows build failure, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/29
- Re: windows build failure, rzl24ozi, 2013/05/29
- Re: windows build failure, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/30
- Re: windows build failure, rzl24ozi, 2013/05/30
- Re: windows build failure, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/31
- MinGW64 (32bit) build with posix configure (Re: windows build failure), rzl24ozi, 2013/05/31
- Re: MinGW64 (32bit) build with posix configure (Re: windows build failure), Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/31
- Re: MinGW64 (32bit) build with posix configure (Re: windows build failure), rzl24ozi, 2013/05/31
Re: windows build failure, cg, 2013/05/29