Re: imagemagic in image-mode and image-dired-thumbnail-mode?

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Vitalie Spinu <address@hidden>
> Cc: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden>,  address@hidden,  address@hidden
> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 00:00:16 +0200
> 
>  > Point is, if the main reason to want ImageMagick is that we want
>  > scaled images, why not have _just_ scaled images, and leave
>  > ImageMagick to its enthusiasts?
> 
> ImageMagick is very good with transparency. From what I can see standard
> decoders don't handle it at all. Isn't it good to have one tool and
> delegate all the work to it?

It's good if it works.  Evidently, it doesn't in this case.