[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sweeter Emacs Lisp
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Sweeter Emacs Lisp |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:13:17 +0900 |
address@hidden writes:
> + *we need a built-in core mapcan (could be called mapcat), filter and
> sequence concatenation (could be called cat?) function that doesn't
> depends on cl-lib*. This is fundamental stuff isn't it? Why is such a
> need to require a library for it?
Yes, it's completely silly that there's no core mapcan...
[I've been periodically asking for this for I think _decades_ but nobody
seems to care... >< ]
-miles
--
Yossarian was moved very deeply by the absolute simplicity of
this clause of Catch-22 and let out a respectful whistle.
"That's some catch, that Catch-22," he observed.
"It's the best there is," Doc Daneeka agreed.
- Re: Sweeter Emacs Lisp, (continued)
Re: Sweeter Emacs Lisp, Stefan Monnier, 2013/07/15
Re: Sweeter Emacs Lisp, Stefan Monnier, 2013/07/16
Re: Sweeter Emacs Lisp, Andreas Schwab, 2013/07/14
Re: Sweeter Emacs Lisp,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: Sweeter Emacs Lisp, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/07/16
- Re: Sweeter Emacs Lisp, Stefan Monnier, 2013/07/16
- Re: Sweeter Emacs Lisp, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/07/16
- Re: Sweeter Emacs Lisp, Andreas Schwab, 2013/07/16
- Re: Sweeter Emacs Lisp, Thierry Volpiatto, 2013/07/16
- Re: Sweeter Emacs Lisp, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/07/16
- Re: Sweeter Emacs Lisp, Andreas Schwab, 2013/07/16
- Re: Sweeter Emacs Lisp, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/07/16
Re: Sweeter Emacs Lisp, Stefan Monnier, 2013/07/16
Re: Sweeter Emacs Lisp, Stefan Monnier, 2013/07/22