Re: Blink cursor changes, possible W32 breakage.

[Stefan Monnier]

> If jit-lock timers are firing too often, that could certainly be fixed
> too, as there's nothing inherent about that which requires frequently
> firing timers when idle (or even when active, if all jit-locking has
> been completed and jit-lock'd buffers haven't changed)...

Jit lock doesn't run any timers by default, AFAIK, and I expect that
fairly few users use the features that require timers (jit-lock-stealth
and jit-lock-defer).


        Stefan