[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Blink cursor changes, possible W32 breakage.

From: Stefan Monnier
Subject: Re: Blink cursor changes, possible W32 breakage.
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 18:40:42 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux)

>> >> AFAIK, and I expect that fairly few users use the features that
>> >> require timers (jit-lock-stealth and jit-lock-defer).
>> > I expect most of them do use timer-dependent features all the time.
>> Why?
> You didn't give any reasons for your assertions, either.

No, indeed, but they're not activated unless the user asks for
it explicitly.  Also jit-lock-stealth used to be enabled by default but
was disabled because too many people found it problematic, so only those
people who don't care about high/excessive background CPU usage will
have it enabled.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]