[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp
From: |
Nic Ferrier |
Subject: |
Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)) |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Jul 2013 19:32:44 +0100 |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>> I disagree. Emacs isn't CommonLisp, never has been CommonLisp and
>> very likely, never will be CommonLisp.
>
> Agreed, but all else being equal, it's better to do the same as
> Common-Lisp (or as Scheme) than to invent our own.
But they aren't equal.
I have looked at CL's system and Scheme's. I'll try and add a summary to
the blog post and also describe how it differs from CL and Scheme.
- adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?), Nic Ferrier, 2013/07/26
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Tom Tromey, 2013/07/26
- RE: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Drew Adams, 2013/07/26
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Nic Ferrier, 2013/07/26
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system, Lars Brinkhoff, 2013/07/26
- RE: CommonLisp namespace system, Drew Adams, 2013/07/26
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system, Nic Ferrier, 2013/07/26
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system, Lars Brinkhoff, 2013/07/29
- RE: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Drew Adams, 2013/07/26
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Richard Stallman, 2013/07/27
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Nic Ferrier, 2013/07/27