[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: make distclean and quail

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: make distclean and quail
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 19:25:45 +0300

> From: Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 17:55:09 +0200
> Cc: Emacs developers <address@hidden>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> > So in both cases you typed "make bootstrap"
> In both cases I typed mboot, which runs the command I described (and
> additionally redirects the output to "| tee trunk.log"). I never ever
> bootstrap in any other way.
> > the Makefile's were all identical,
> I cannot be sure.

Then I suggest to collect the Makefile's as well, with each log.

> > Any idea why it does "am--refresh" in one case, but not the other?
> The dependency list of am--refresh isn't big:
>   am--refresh: $(srcdir)/aclocal.m4 $(srcdir)/configure 
> $(srcdir)/src/config.in
> and I'm sure some or all these changed in the ~80 commits between
> successful and unsuccesful. Though likely the reconfigure step wasn't
> invoked during the unsuccessful bootstrap, but by some previous "make
> all".

The question is: do all of the "bad" builds have this part in them?  I
think we need more statistics, and we need to compare the Makefile's
as well.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]