Re: Lexical byte-compilation warnings cleanup

[Stefan Monnier]

>> Indeed, it does not refer to the dynamically bound variable.
> Why is that?  Will this be fixed, or is this the intended design?

Intended design.

> Even if things are currently a work in progress, is that the direction
> you intend to head, or are you aiming elsewhere?

I have never aimed to do what CL does.  As language designers, we just
take idea from here and there.

Elisp's design is different from CL's design partly for historical
reasons but also for technical reasons: Elisp needs to be interpretable
efficiently, for example.


        Stefan