|
From: | Paul Eggert |
Subject: | Re: the state of the concurrency branch |
Date: | Sun, 25 Aug 2013 13:02:35 -0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130803 Thunderbird/17.0.8 |
Tom Tromey wrote: > If you want it to be optional, could you say why? It's going to need to be optional anyway, for the benefit of hosts that don't support threads, so it might as well be a knob that the builder can turn.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |