[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Changes in revision 114466

From: Xue Fuqiao
Subject: Re: Changes in revision 114466
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 11:40:16 +0800

On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Drew Adams <address@hidden> wrote:
> But the statement that every user option and command needs
> documentation does not speak about manuals.  In any case, that's how I
> understood it: these things need documentation.

Sorry for being unclear.  Actually, I _do_ (and _did_) mean the
documentation in the manuals (*.texi).

> What we might want/need (I have proposed this several times, and so have
> others) is linking from doc strings to the manuals.  That would indeed be
> useful, IMO.  It would provide missing glue, as you put it.
> There are a very few doc strings, IIRC, that actually do this.  It would
> be good to generalize it, or at least make use of it more.


Best regards, Xue Fuqiao.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]