[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Modern conventions for structuring Emacs Lisp libraries
From: |
Daniel Colascione |
Subject: |
Re: Modern conventions for structuring Emacs Lisp libraries |
Date: |
Sat, 05 Oct 2013 12:18:19 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 |
On 10/5/13 9:52 AM, Richard Stallman wrote:
> | ;; GNU Emacs is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> | ;; but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> | ;; MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> | ;; GNU General Public License for more details.
Is this shouty bit really necessary? Has there been a case in recorded
history of a distributor or developer of a program being held liable
because he omitted similar language? The SQLite people haven't been
sued, after all, and they release their software in the public domain.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature