Re: Emacs as word processor

[Lennart Borgman]

On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> That's unfair: you said nothing about those features in the text to
> which I responded.  You just talked about the difference between
> imperative and declarative approaches to specifying attributes.  Now
> you've changed the subject, so I no longer understand what are we
> discussing.
>
> If you are saying that these features don't exist in Emacs, I agree:
> they don't.  But I don't see the significance of that fact, since
> everybody agrees that Emacs is not a WYSIWYG word processor at this
> time.
>
> If you are saying that these features could never be part of a face
> spec, then I don't think I agree; please explain why you think so.

Styles may depend on the structure to. Compare the spec for CSS.